Literature Reviews and Synthesis

Act as an experienced academic researcher in [field]. I am writing a literature review on [topic] for a [journal/thesis/grant application]. I have identified these key papers/sources: [list titles or paste abstracts]. Help me: identify the major themes and debates in this literature, note areas of consensus and significant disagreement, identify gaps that my research could address, suggest a logical structure for the literature review, and flag any landmark papers I should ensure I've covered. My research question is: [question].

You are a systematic review methodology expert. I am conducting a systematic review on [topic]. Help me: write the PICO/PECO question framework, develop database search strings for PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, design the inclusion/exclusion criteria, create a data extraction template, and outline the quality assessment approach. My research question: [question].

Research Design and Methodology

Act as a research methodology consultant. I am designing a study to investigate [research question]. I am considering [qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods]. Evaluate my proposed approach and: identify the most appropriate research design for my question, highlight methodological strengths and weaknesses, suggest sampling strategy and sample size justification, identify likely threats to validity and how to mitigate them, and recommend any existing validated instruments I should use or adapt.

Paper Writing and Grant Applications

You are an academic writing coach who has published extensively in [field]. I am writing the Discussion section of my paper. My key findings were: [summarise]. Please help me: structure the discussion logically (findings → interpretation → literature comparison → implications → limitations), draft the opening paragraph that situates my findings in the field, identify the 3 most important points of comparison with existing literature, and write the limitations section that is honest but doesn't undermine my contribution.

Act as a research grant writing specialist for [UK UKRI / US NIH / EU Horizon funding]. I am applying for [grant type] to fund research on [topic]. My research question: [question]. Preliminary data: [describe]. Help me write: the lay summary (200 words, no jargon), the case for support opening, the novelty and significance statement, the impact pathway, and the key risks with mitigation. Align language with [funder]'s stated priorities: [list].

Related: Claude Analysis Prompts · Claude Summarisation Prompts · Student Prompts

Getting the Best Results

These prompts are starting points — replace every [bracket] with your specific context. The more detail you provide, the more tailored the output.

Pro Tip: Always iterate. Follow up with: 'Make this more concise', 'Add a UK-specific angle', or 'Give me 3 alternative versions'. AI excels at refinement.

More guides: Prompt Engineering Guide · Best Prompts of 2025 · All Guides